It may have been in Stephen Fry's marvellous 'The Liar', or it may not, that a character muses on the benefit of having a simple term for those unlikely to engage in after-dinner games. The simple expedient of having the word was sufficent to de-mystify their reluctance, and force them to play. I am almost curious enough to go and look it up, but that would mean leaving my chair. and taking four and a half steps over to the bookcase. Hmm, it's a tough one. No, it's too annoying, I'm going to have to find out. Talk among yourselves for a moment or two.
Right, it's by Mr Fry's eternally endearing creation Professor Trefusis, who happily shares the following thought:
the simple Papuan word redatt which, as some of you may know, means 'unlikely to take part in evening games'.... Most people who do not like to engage in after-dinner games and sports in some measure hold themselves aloof and consider, with distressing hauteur, that they are somehow above the sportive frivolities of other men. To be told that their measure has been taken by a race thousands of miles away, whose life style might be imagined to be far less sophisticated than their own, is too much for them. The unsporting persons are not after all fascinating or alluringly enigmatic -- they are redatt, unlikely to take part in evening games.
Now, I wonder what my point was? Oh yes, participation in games. I am far more likely to show enthusiasm for games that allow me to remain supine. Much as the Australian sports commentators were fond of saying about the British olympians last time around, I do better when seated. So essentially, Scrabble: yes, Sardines: no.
Yesterday I was fortunate enough to be invited to the beautiful garden of some friends, for an afternoon of croquet and cream tea. I was rather hoping to leapfrog, in a purely metaphorical sense as per the previous paragraph, straight to the cream tea. When we arrived a few minutes late, a game was already in full swing-clunk, and it looked likely I would be able to install myself on a sun lounger and engage in nothing more energetic than a little light applause.
I had expended due effort in meeting the dress code, which was "hats and gloves". Our little group pulled out all available stops and duly adorned ourselves with hats, gloves, and even petticoats under summer dresses. It was really a waste there wasn't a wedding photograph to crash on the way.
There were pages of instructions about how best to play the game, which I had a scant look through before deciding to admire the climbing rose instead. Regrettably there came a point where to refuse to get up and grasp a mallet would have attacted far more attention than almost any maladroit swing on my part, so we began an amble round the lawn. The expert host kept having to call us back from the tea table, where we'd tried to slip in a cream scone before our next turn. I think it became clear we perhaps weren't competition standard. Which is not to say we're not competitive - far from it. It's more what I've best heard described as a "can't win? won't play" attitude, poorly disguised as casual unconcern.
The game was mercifully brief, and I cast around for a useful future diversionary tactic. I remember these now from school, even then used
for the purpose of Getting Out of Games. For a short while I managed to look very busy re-filling the teapot, and after that, longing for another nap, I had a brainwave.
I remembered my host had a stack of quilt pieces she had been tasked with sewing together. What a happy time was had by all, as the others continued their machiavellian tactics on the croquet lawn, and I progressed from tea to champagne, occasionally passing a needle through a quilting square. Well played.
I had expended due effort in meeting the dress code, which was "hats and gloves". Our little group pulled out all available stops and duly adorned ourselves with hats, gloves, and even petticoats under summer dresses. It was really a waste there wasn't a wedding photograph to crash on the way.
There were pages of instructions about how best to play the game, which I had a scant look through before deciding to admire the climbing rose instead. Regrettably there came a point where to refuse to get up and grasp a mallet would have attacted far more attention than almost any maladroit swing on my part, so we began an amble round the lawn. The expert host kept having to call us back from the tea table, where we'd tried to slip in a cream scone before our next turn. I think it became clear we perhaps weren't competition standard. Which is not to say we're not competitive - far from it. It's more what I've best heard described as a "can't win? won't play" attitude, poorly disguised as casual unconcern.
The game was mercifully brief, and I cast around for a useful future diversionary tactic. I remember these now from school, even then used
for the purpose of Getting Out of Games. For a short while I managed to look very busy re-filling the teapot, and after that, longing for another nap, I had a brainwave.I remembered my host had a stack of quilt pieces she had been tasked with sewing together. What a happy time was had by all, as the others continued their machiavellian tactics on the croquet lawn, and I progressed from tea to champagne, occasionally passing a needle through a quilting square. Well played.









